Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
56,264 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,623 (90%) 
Undecided
  
 3,130 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,511 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JustEMV (talk) on 2024-09-02 19:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Peter the Apostle in Andahuaylillas from north-east
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-09-05 17:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Filarete tower in Milan from east
Reason:
There are many images of the Filarete Tower in Milan, but no one has yet thought to photograph it from this particular angle... -- Terragio67 (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-09-05 17:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Church Santa Cristina (Cesena) - interior view from the main entrance
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 01:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-09-06 04:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Spondylus echinatus, left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-06 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Muzio Scevola davanti a Porsenna (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)

 Support Useful andused --Llez (talk) 04:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-06 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
La multiplication des pains par Francisco de Herrera (Le vieux) - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-06 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Retrat de Pompeu Gener - Francesc Inglada - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 03:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-09-06 08:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Château Laroque-Maynard, Autoire
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Atal Setu and bridges across Rio de Ourem, Panaji
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Front Elevation of St. Andrew's Church, Vasco

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 03:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Side elevation of Basilica of Bom Jesus (Goa)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Front elevation of Basilica of Bom Jesus (Goa)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Windows of Pastoral Institute St Pius X
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Fontainhas bridge
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Vasco da Gama residence in Fontainhas

 Question This is 1 of 144 images of assorted buildings in the linked Category. I did not find any mention of this building in Wikipedia and a casual search of the web. Could you provide some reference or link indicating the notability of this building? --Tagooty (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony in Candolim

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-06 10:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of Our Lady of Piety in Candolim

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-09-06 15:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Restoration of the Prinses Margriettunnel Working area southeast entrance/exit of the tunnel .Pile driver.

 Oppose A temporary structure during renovation of a specific tunnel is not notable. --Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-07 03:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Stongdey village, Zanskar - view from the northeast
Used in:
en:Stongdey • wikidata:Q130124623
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-07 03:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Jesus the Victorian Adam art in the Courtyard of Igreja de São Francisco de Assis (Goa)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-09-07 04:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Old Patto bridge in Panaji
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-07 04:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Phuktal Monastery Guest House, Zanskar - view from southeast
Used in:
en:Phugtal Monastery • wikidata:Q130249751
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-09-07 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Trisidos semitorta (Half-propellor Ark), right valve

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 04:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-07 04:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Due dame eleganti (Two elegant ladies) - Vittorio Matteo Corcos
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-07 04:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Tropinota squalida on Silene dioica
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-07 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
La Petite mariée par Antonio Pérez Rubio - Musée Goya

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 04:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-09-07 15:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Cargo ship RUDAN-D Port side & front.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-09-08 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Trisidos semitorta (Half-propellor Ark), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-08 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Nudo in maschera (Akt in Maske) - Giacomo Grosso

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-08 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
La Lettre by Luis Paret y Alcázar - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-08 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Targa commemorativa di Antonio Vivaldi in conservatorio di musica della Pietà

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-08 10:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Maison de Gilles de la Boë, Lille Nord, view from Place Louise-de-Bettignies
Reason:
Quality images link=Commons:Quality images Historical monument of France geocoded and used in articles. -- Pierre André (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-08 16:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Purne, Zanskar - view from the southwest
Used in:
en:Purne • wikidata:Q104862132
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-09 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Gino Rossi - Maternità - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-09 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Bougeoir - série Nature - "Pâte de Verre" by Daum - Nancy France

 Comment With 220 images in the CAT and many sub-cats, it is difficult to see if this one is best. A sub-cat for candleholder(s) would be useful. --Tagooty (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Tagooty: Thanks for your comment, I will follow your advice. There are very few candlesticks in Daum's production. On Commun there is only one, that's what stopped me from making a category. But nothing prevents me from doing it, even if it is alone for a moment...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-09 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Caprices N°51 d'après Goya by Lucas y Villaamil, Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-09 15:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Zangla, Zanskar - view from south-east
Used in:
en:Zangla • es:Zangla • ru:Зангла • wikidata:Q4186181
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-09 15:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Nithiravilai junction - view from the east
Used in:
en:Nithiravilai • ta:நித்திரவிளை • wikidata:Q7041270
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 09 September 2024
Scope:
Aulocera padma (Great Satyr), ventral

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-09-09 16:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Motorbeunschip SOLA GRATIA ENI - MMSI 02104727 - 244700831. Port side.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 09 September 2024
Scope:
Pseudocoladenia festa (Dull Pied Flat), dorsal

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 09 September 2024
Scope:
Lethe maitrya (Barred Woodbrown), ventral

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 09 September 2024
Scope:
Lethe jalaurida (Small Silverfork), dorsal
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-09 18:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz eCitan - right rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz W 420
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-09 18:18 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW F70 - left front view
Used in:
sv:BMW F70
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-09 18:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi A3 8Y Sedan - right front view
Used in:
de:Audi A3 8Y
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-09-09 22:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Library Biblioteca Malatestiana - Aula del Nuti
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-09-09 22:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Maritime Museum Trabaccolo da trasporto - (Transport lugger)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This one has more representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 01:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 01:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=907565339"